Did Obama Pass the Iran Deal?


Did Obama successfully pass the Iran nuclear deal or was achieving it more complex than its implementation let’s believe? This article explores the complexities surrounding the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), widely known as the Iran Deal, examining the political, legislative, and diplomatic maneuvers that shaped its trajectory. By what strategies did Obama manage to overcome congressional resistance, global mistrustful view, and other global tensions to achieve this historic deal?

Was the decision to adopt the deal taken as an executive decision, or was it attributed to a consensus of the executive? Answering these questions enables a critical assessment of Obama’s part in one of the most contentious foreign policies of his administration.

What Is the Iran Deal ?

Imagine a neighbourhood where one house keeps stockpiling fireworks. Now, fireworks are fun until someone blows up the block. The Iran Deal was meant to stop Iran from building a nuclear bomb (their version of those fireworks).

Signed in 2015, the deal brought together the U.S., Iran, and other world powers (think a group project, but with nukes). Obama did not do it solo, it was a team effort. But he was the captain.

Did Obama Pass the Nuclear Deal?

Yes, but not in the “I signed it; it is all me” kind of way. The deal was signed during the Obama administration with the assistance of his Secretary of State John Kerry and other officials. It never came to a direct vote in Congress because it was not a treaty; it was an executive agreement. This gave Obama the green light to seal the deal.

So, while Obama did not technically pass it, he was the face of it. Think of him as the coach who guided the team to victory.

Why Was the Iran Deal Such a Big Deal?

Here’s the gist:

·     Iran has agreed to reduce the production of uranium (a crucial process in the production of nukes).

·    They cut the number of nuclear reactors they operate in half and the number of cascades by 70% and limit the enrichment level to 3.67% (far below the weapon-grade 90% level).

·    Compliance with the rules was baked in through IAEA inspections to make sure they complied enriched uranium by 98% and limit enrichment levels to 3.67% (far below weapon-grade levels).

·   Inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were baked in to ensure they stuck to the rules.

In return, the U.S. and others removed the economic sanctions put on Iran. This gave Iran access to frozen assets and global markets kind of like lifting a shopping ban on a shopaholic.

The Big Question: Did It Work?

For a while, yes.

· 2016 to 2018: Iran followed the agreement and analysts observed that there was a decrease in nuclear work.

· Sanctions relief boosted Iran’s economy (GDP grew by 13.4% in 2016).

But the story did not have a happy ending. In 2018, Trump withdrew the United States from the deal which he described as the worst deal ever. Iran eventually resumed higher uranium enrichment, reigniting global worries.

The Numbers Behind the Deal

Here’s a quick look at what the Iran Deal accomplished (2015–2018):

MetricBefore DealDuring the Deal
Uranium StockpileOver 10,000 kgReduced to 300 kg
Enrichment Levels20% (near bomb-grade)Capped at 3.67%
Centrifuges Operating~20,000~5,000
IAEA InspectionsLimitedComprehensive, daily access

Why Did People Love or Hate It?

People were very divided. Here is why:

Why Some Loved It

  • No Nukes, Please: The deal delayed Iran’s ability to build a bomb by 10–15 years.
  • Diplomacy Over War: It was a peaceful way to address a volatile issue.
  • Global Teamwork: Countries worked together, proving international diplomacy could work.

Why Others Hated It

Below are the reasons why others hate this.

  • Short-Term Fix: Critics said it only delayed the problem.
  • Sanctions Lifted Too Soon: Some feared Iran would use the money to fund terrorism.
  • Trust Issues: Could Iran be trusted to stick to the rules?

What Changed After Trump Pulled Out?

In 2018, Trump withdrew, reinstating sanctions on Iran. Here’s what followed:

  • Iran retaliated: They resumed enriching uranium above the agreed levels.
  • More Tensions: Relations between the U.S. and Iran hit rock bottom (remember the Soleimani incident?).
  • Global Worries: The world started stressing about nukes again.

Lessons Learned: Was the Deal Worth It?

The Iran Deal was not perfect, but it did slow down Iran’s nuclear program and opened doors for diplomacy. Think of it as putting a bandage on a wound, not a cure, but better than nothing.

Here is what we learned:

  • Diplomacy is hard: Getting countries to agree on anything is a miracle.
  • Trust matters: Deals only work if both sides keep their promises.
  • Long-term planning: A 10-year delay is great, but what happens after?

FAQs

Was the Iran Deal legally binding?
Nope. It was an executive agreement, which is why Trump could pull out without Congress.

Did the deal stop Iran from making a bomb?
Temporarily, yes. Experts agree it delayed their nuclear progress by several years.

Will the deal come back?
That is a big “maybe.” Talks about reviving it have been ongoing, but nothing’s set in stone.

Why This Matters Now

The Iran Deal is not just a history lesson it is a blueprint for how the world handles tricky issues. It is no different with nukes, climate change, or even AI; diplomacy and cooperation are the way to go.

In essence, the Iran Deal was not just about Obama or Iran, or even the U.S. It was a step towards making the world a little less scary one agreement at a time.

Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.



Source link

What do you think?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

No Comments Yet.